<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Reputation Premium - Latest Comments</title><link>http://reputationpremium.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://reputationpremium.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:30:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tiger Woods – Shanking it Badly on Reputation</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/02/tiger-woods-%e2%80%93-shanking-it-badly-on-reputation/#comment-141973269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tiger Woods' former mistress Rachel Uchitel has been offered 1 million dollars to work at the notorious Moonlite Bunny Ranch in Nevada. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">small business seo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiger Woods – Shanking it Badly on Reputation</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/02/tiger-woods-%e2%80%93-shanking-it-badly-on-reputation/#comment-139534576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For all those who wondered last year when the world rankings finally would start to reflect Tiger Woods' tumultuous 2010, don't snooze. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> Fertility Medicines</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:05:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiger Woods – Shanking it Badly on Reputation</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/02/tiger-woods-%e2%80%93-shanking-it-badly-on-reputation/#comment-138153458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tiger Woods tees off the fifth hole during the final round of the Farmers Insurance Open. ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lead net pro software</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LeBron’s Taking the Heat: Can This Reputation Ever Rebound?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/10/lebron%e2%80%99s-taking-the-heat-can-this-reputation-ever-rebound/#comment-131515542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This posting was authored Carreen Winters, EVP of Corporate Communications at MWW Group.  She can be reached at cwinters@mww.com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:00:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LeBron’s Taking the Heat: Can This Reputation Ever Rebound?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/10/lebron%e2%80%99s-taking-the-heat-can-this-reputation-ever-rebound/#comment-131180906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;who is the author of this article?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BossProductions</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:54:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To be influential, you must be relevant</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2011/01/to-be-influential-you-must-be-relevant/#comment-128631729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ROR? Oh, you're referring to Return on Relevance. A good starting point for most project brainstorming sessions,and certainly for all message targeting discussions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sklar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:59:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Nike Too Big to Fail, Reputation-Wise?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/12/is-nike-too-big-to-fail-reputation-wise/#comment-126721317</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nike is trying to buy up all the competition to become a huge company.  It is not good for the little store and not good for the consumer because after they buy up all the competition, the prices will be what they want to charge and not what the consumer wants to pay.  In my opinion, Nike is too big and consumers should realize this and put their hard-earned money elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carol D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:53:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From Cuffs to Debonair Millionaire: Taking a Page Out of Diddy’s Reputation Book</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/12/from-cuffs-to-debonair-millionaire-taking-a-page-out-of-diddy%e2%80%99s-reputation-book/#comment-125245603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read a little bit sorry im a little selfish I wanted you to hear what I wrote it may not be good but your the only person. I wanna share it with I dont think the perfect match exsists but some get close. Submission to u, submission to u, submission to u,ooooo, ooooo  I never thoughtthat love could feel like this.Im tantalized with every kiss. No one has ever loved me the way you do thats why I stay down on my knees in total submission to you. Because I never wanna be back in that position of yearning just for someone to hold me to look me in my eyes and tell me he loves me and needs me  submission to u, submisssion to u, submission to u  can you imagine the pain of a man never being honest with you . The neverending eye waterfallls. I CANT GO BACK I CANT LET GO what I found in you is so grreen and blue on this side submission2 u,submission2u, submission2u&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shay Notes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:08:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashable’s Media Predictions for 2011</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/12/mashable%e2%80%99s-media-predictions-for-2011/#comment-119840010</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I feel that traditional media and social media will fuse. Perhaps the familiar face reporting the news will have more interaction, via various social media channels, with their viewers. I am curious how Google TV, and other similar products, will add to and change media. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erik Karff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:02:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Four Loko’s New Formula Be a Buzz Kill for the Rapper-Chic Drink?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/12/will-four-loko%e2%80%99s-new-formula-be-a-buzz-kill-for-the-rapper-chic-drink/#comment-117817799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the new formulation of four loko is not even out yet. the above post is just a troll aka a noob on the site who posts garbage/unfounded messages and leaves..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Locochriz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:15:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Four Loko’s New Formula Be a Buzz Kill for the Rapper-Chic Drink?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/12/will-four-loko%e2%80%99s-new-formula-be-a-buzz-kill-for-the-rapper-chic-drink/#comment-115117797</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Drinking the new Grape Four Loko now and it is AWFUL!!!! Won't be drinking it again. On a fluk I have an ORIGINAL CAN of Four Loko. Might have to bust that open!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tamilmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:42:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Quotes From World Business Forum 2010</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/10/top-10-quotes-from-world-business-forum-2010/#comment-85977208</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading.  Please feel free to add if you think we've missed a big moment that should be in the top ten. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carreen Winters</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:00:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Quotes From World Business Forum 2010</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/10/top-10-quotes-from-world-business-forum-2010/#comment-84909422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing these quotes.  It is intersting to hear what others took away and be reminded of the wonderful experience this conference offered.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maureen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When did staying connected move from convenient to obsessive?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/09/when-did-staying-connected-move-from-convenient-to-obsessive/#comment-74938829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that personal relationships = happiness.  Thanks for your thoughts&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carreen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:10:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When did staying connected move from convenient to obsessive?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/09/when-did-staying-connected-move-from-convenient-to-obsessive/#comment-74851228</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Personal relationships create happiness more so than money.... in the adoption of mobile communications we are filling that void of having personal relationships with others and indeed mobile communications and ironically social media might of helped increase the size of that void.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jasminew812</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:54:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR firm’s reputation at risk from HP’s CEO fiasco</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/08/pr-firm%e2%80%99s-reputation-at-risk-from-hp%e2%80%99s-ceo-fiasco/#comment-67694587</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bob, I think you have pointed out that the "playbook" no longer applies....with one exception.  It is still not great when the communications advisor becomes the story. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carreen Winters</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Please don’t call me – or Steve Jobs &amp;#8211; a SPIN DOCTOR…</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/07/please-don%e2%80%99t-call-me-%e2%80%93-or-steve-jobs-a-spin-doctor%e2%80%a6/#comment-63758372</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Test&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gbarone</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:42:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: George Steinbrenner….visionary and iconic for sure….will the Yankees ever be the same?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/07/george-steinbrenner%e2%80%a6-visionary-and-iconic-for-sure%e2%80%a6-will-the-yankees-ever-be-the-same/#comment-63198941</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But what will the Sports writers in the NY tabloids write about?  We didn't get LeBron....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cwinters</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: George Steinbrenner….visionary and iconic for sure….will the Yankees ever be the same?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/07/george-steinbrenner%e2%80%a6-visionary-and-iconic-for-sure%e2%80%a6-will-the-yankees-ever-be-the-same/#comment-62234742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You raise an interesting question, and I believe that it comes down to the matter of how deeply ingrained George's ethics have become in the Yankee organization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thinking back to the 70s and 80s, it was hard to open the sports pages without finding some Steinbrenner controversy.  At that point, it seemed to be more about the owner than his team, but there was no mistaking what his vision was and what he expected of the people he hired.  In later years, his antics became much more muted, but his standards remained, and it became more about the team than the owner.  Granted, he'd aged and retired from active leadership, but one would also like to think that he felt that the people he hired had become good stewards of the brand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With careful tending, George's standards of excellence and leadership will persist for decades to come.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sue Kaufmann</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:04:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When a Brand Goes &amp;#8216;Graveyard Dead&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/03/when-a-brand-goes-graveyard-dead/#comment-63764015</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like a good PR student I have diligently been following the whole Tiger drama from the perspective of "If I was his 'handler" what would I do?" And I wonder who is really making the decisions for Tiger?  Seems to me like any good PR person would recognize the building blocks for creating a proper reputational foundation and strongly encourage (read: force) Tiger to follow the rules.  But perhaps this is another indication of Tiger's arrogance and disregard for anyone other than himself as he isn't listening to the advice of the experts who could save his butt.  There is a process for dealing with personal crises like these and it seems to me like Tiger deserves his "graveyard dead" classification for again thinking he's above the rules.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ellie Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiger Woods – Shanking it Badly on Reputation</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/02/tiger-woods-%e2%80%93-shanking-it-badly-on-reputation/#comment-35573556</link><description>&lt;p&gt; . . . . "FOOOUUURRRR" . . . . ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Ridgeway</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiger Woods – Shanking it Badly on Reputation</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/02/tiger-woods-%e2%80%93-shanking-it-badly-on-reputation/#comment-35553897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't have articulated it any better. There's so much being made about whether Tiger's personal life should be so thoroughly scrutinized. Even if he's not interested in working to repair his personal brand - the very brand that he has leveraged into hundreds of millions of endorsement dollars as a public figure - a quick, humble and transparent approach is still the best way to neutralize the scrutiny and allow his family to move on with their lives. By remaining defensive, hoping that everyone will forget and continuing with his current strategy, he's actually providing critics with new ammunition and prolonging the pain rather than diffusing the issue by taking his lumps and moving on. Andy Pettitte is probably one of the best case studies on how a pro athlete can quickly take full responsibility for something, apologize and move on. And if Mark McGwire can be forgiven after years of hoping it would just go away, then almost any person or brand can start fresh. And the parallel to the corporate world is spot on.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maveritt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:38:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does &amp;#8220;We&amp;#8217;re Sorry&amp;#8221; Cut It?</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2010/01/does-were-sorry-cut-it/#comment-29685488</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike, I couldn't agree more. Actions ALWAYS speak louder than words, especially in times of crisis. Communicators can focus on telling the story of the actions taken to solve the problem and that does a company a world of good. Nice post. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bsalvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:33:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Employee Free Choice Act Far From Dead</title><link>http://www.reputationpremium.com/2009/07/employee-free-choice-act-far-from-dead/#comment-28206802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;direct relationship with your employees, make friends with them and have some quality time with them, drink wine with them sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">UAE Jobs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:06:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Of Reputation and Strollers</title><link>http://www.returnonreputation.com/2009/11/of-reputation-and-strollers/#comment-22914455</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"because having a nightmare is predicated on getting some sleep, of which I’m certain they went without for a few days." .... good one!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why wait so long to issue the recall?  Why was 12 baby-digits the magic number? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Re</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:26:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>